New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.
Starred by 4 users
Status: Archived
Owner:
Closed: Aug 4
Cc:
Components:
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment
adapt_reason does not include CPU if the input resolution is reduced to match the encode target
Project Member Reported by bemasc@webrtc.org, Mar 22 2014 Back to list
If a webrtc client can scale the input more efficiently than webrtc itself can, then that client may want to observe adapt_reason and, when the adapter downscales due to CPU limitation, also downscale the input to match.  However, this creates a paradox: downscaling the input to match the encode resolution causes adapt_reason to be zero.

Instead, adapt_reason should continue to indicate that it is CPU-limited, until the CPU monitor determines that webrtc is ready to encode at the previous resolution again.

This requires some care, to avoid "ping-pong" between resolutions, if reducing the encode resolution triggers a chain of events that causes other CPU consumption to decrease.  Perhaps webrtc should record any decrease in CPU utilization associated with a decrease in input resolution, so that it does not set adapt_reason to zero until a similar increase could be tolerated.
 
Project Member Comment 1 by bemasc@webrtc.org, Mar 25 2014
To clarify, the "ping-pong" problem can in principle also be avoided, for any given scenario, simply by lowering the adapt-up threshold.
Comment 2 by vrk@webrtc.org, Oct 14 2014
Labels: Area-Video
Project Member Comment 3 by tnakamura@webrtc.org, Nov 4 2015
Cc: -wu@webrtc.org sprang@webrtc.org mflodman@webrtc.org
This bug hasn't been modified for more than a year. Is this still a valid open issue?
Project Member Comment 4 by mflodman@webrtc.org, Dec 10 2015
Åsa,
Is this still an issue_
Project Member Comment 5 by mflodman@webrtc.org, Mar 1 2016
Labels: EngTriaged
Project Member Comment 6 by mflodman@webrtc.org, Dec 1 2016
Åsa,
Anything to do here or shall we close?
Project Member Comment 7 by mflodman@webrtc.org, Aug 4
Status: Archived
[Bulk edit] This issue was created more than a year ago and hasn't been modified the last six months -> archiving.

If this is still a valid issue that should be open, please reopen again.
Sign in to add a comment