New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 2489 link

Starred by 24 users

Issue metadata

Status: Available
Owner: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Enhancement

Blocked on:
issue 2488

Sign in to add a comment

Generating VP8 fmtp parameters

Project Member Reported by, Oct 10 2013

Issue description specifies that the size parameters max-fr and max-fs are REQUIRED in an SDP description.

The implementations need to generate sensible values for the platform they're running on.

Eng owner:


Comment 1 by, Oct 14 2014

Labels: Area-Video

Comment 2 by, Oct 14 2014

Labels: -Area-Video Area-Network

Comment 3 by, Nov 3 2014

Labels: Mstone-42 EngTriaged
Status: Assigned
Assigning tentatively to Peter for now.
To help us move forward with this bug: Is it more important that we generate these values or that these values are honored by the system?

It'd also be helpful to elaborate on "sensible values" here.

Comment 5 by, Jan 5 2015

The state we want to get to is that the receiver always sets the parameters, and the sender always respects them.

Case analysis:

- Receiver doesn't sent, sender doesn't respect: Current situation. Sender sends whatever it wants.
- Receiver sets, sender does not respect: Worse than current - formally noncompliant, receivers written in expectation of respected limits will be overrun.
- Receiver does not set, sender respects: Sender sends what it wants. No worse than current situation.
- Receiver sets, sender respects: Good.

From this analysis, the first implementation should be sender respecting the parameters. It's OK to make our receiver send some hardcoded values (HD@30?) as a first implementation - then we can change them (up or down depending on platform) afterwards.

Project Member

Comment 6 by, Feb 19 2015

Labels: -Mstone-42 Mstone-44
This looks like it's not hitting m42.  Update it if I'm wrong.
Project Member

Comment 7 by, Dec 28 2015

Project Member

Comment 8 by, Jan 29 2016

Labels: -Mstone-44
I don't see any CLs linked to this bug, so I don't think it's been fixed. Removing milestone label since this bug hasn't been updated in quite some time.
Project Member

Comment 9 by, Nov 8 2016

Labels: Pri-2
Project Member

Comment 10 by, Mar 30 2018

Owner: ----
Status: Available (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment