New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.
Starred by 11 users

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Closed: Aug 2017
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Enhancement

Blocked on:
issue 1151

Sign in to add a comment

NTP based render timestamps at the receiver

Reported by, Apr 17 2013

Issue description

To match the sender where the capture timestamps now are specified based on NTP, we should also specify render timestamps based on NTP on the receiver.

Comment 1 by, May 14 2013

Blockedon: webrtc:1151
Project Member

Comment 2 by, Aug 27 2013

Labels: Dev-QAReview-NA
Project Member

Comment 3 by, Jun 7 2014

Ronghua, has this been addressed?

Comment 4 by, Jun 9 2014

If I understand this correctly, this is about the render timestamp (controls when to display the frame). In that case, no.
Project Member

Comment 5 by, Jun 10 2014

Since we moved webrtc capture timestamps to be NTP based, we figured it would make sense to also have the render timestamps be NTP based. Given the recent discussions about capture timestamps etc, I think this is still up for discussion and should be reevaluated before we do any more work.

Comment 6 by, Oct 15 2014

Labels: Area-Render Area-Video
Project Member

Comment 7 by, Dec 10 2014

Labels: EngTriaged Mstone-43
Project Member

Comment 8 by, Mar 31 2015

Should we move the milestone?
Project Member

Comment 9 by, Apr 7 2015

Labels: -Mstone-43 Mstone-45
Project Member

Comment 10 by, Dec 1 2015

Labels: fixit
Project Member

Comment 11 by, Dec 4 2015

Labels: -Mstone-45 Mstone-49
Project Member

Comment 12 by, Dec 8 2015

Labels: -fixit
Owner: ----
Project Member

Comment 13 by, Jan 29 2016

Labels: -Mstone-49
Status: Available (was: Assigned)
This bug has no owner, so I'm removing the milestone label. mflodman@, feel free to "reschedule" this for a future milestone.
Project Member

Comment 14 by, Mar 1 2016

To Erik for triaging.
Project Member

Comment 15 by, Feb 1 2017

Project Member

Comment 16 by, Aug 4 2017

Status: Archived (was: Available)
[Bulk edit] This issue was created more than a year ago and hasn't been modified the last six months -> archiving.

If this is still a valid issue that should be open, please reopen again.

Sign in to add a comment