New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 924105 link

Starred by 4 users
Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 924317
Owner: ----
Closed: Today
Cc:
vamshi.kommuri@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Windows
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

GWT Applications not working on Canary

Reported by georgegr...@gmail.com, Today (17 hours ago) 
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/71.0.3578.98 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Access a site that uses the open source GWT Project on Chrome Canary 
Example site: http://samples.gwtproject.org/samples/Showcase/Showcase.html#!CwCheckBox 
Observe that "Widget demos" do not work as expected (See GIF for demo)

I think this is potentially related to events no firing as expected.

What is the expected behavior?
The website load and work

What went wrong?
The websites do not load

Did this work before? Yes 72.0.3626.64 (Beta)

Chrome version: 73.0.3680.0  Channel: canary
OS Version: 10.0
Flash Version: 

I've added a GIF demonstrating the issue, along with a picture showing what happens in AWS (Which also uses GWT)
aws_broken.jpg
18.7 KB View Download
gwt_broken.gif
977 KB View Download

Comment 1 by thad.hum...@gmail.com, Today (14 hours ago) 

I am seeing similar problems with Canary and three production apps written and built with GWT 2.7.0. Two apps fail to load anything beyond the index.html's background image. The third app (which uses some MGWT) loads the initial UI, but does not respond to a button click. All apps behave fine in standard Chrome.

OS: Mojave 10.14.2
Chrome standard: 71.0.3578.98
Chrome Canary: 73.0.3680.0

Comment 2 by susan.boorgula@chromium.org, Today (10 hours ago)

Labels: Needs-Triage-M73 Needs-Bisect

Comment 3 by vamshi.kommuri@chromium.org, Today (29 minutes ago)

Cc: vamshi.kommuri@chromium.org
Components: Blink>Loader
Labels: -Needs-Bisect Triaged-ET
Mergedinto: 924317
Status: Duplicate (was: Unconfirmed)
Thanks for filing the issue!

As the issue seems to be similar to that of Issue 924317, hence merging into it and marking it as Duplicate.
►

Sign in to add a comment