Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2%-1.3% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 624475:624475 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Today
(20 hours ago)
Assigning to wez@chromium.org because this is the only CL in range: Revert "Roll src-internal 9eb5076ed0c1..187f3372e0fd (1 commits)" This reverts commit b1e66fcbbc8966733e6ecd02debcf9807625e1d7. Reason for revert: Appeared to break win32-rel compilation (see https://crbug.com/923692). Original change's description: > Roll src-internal 9eb5076ed0c1..187f3372e0fd (1 commits) > > https://chrome-internal.googlesource.com/chrome/src-internal.git/+log/9eb5076ed0c1..187f3372e0fd > > > Created with: > gclient setdep -r src-internal@187f3372e0fd > > The AutoRoll server is located here: https://autoroll-internal.skia.org/r/src-internal-chromium-autoroll > > Documentation for the AutoRoller is here: > https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/master/autoroll/README.md > > If the roll is causing failures, please contact the current sheriff, who should > be CC'd on the roll, and stop the roller if necessary. > > > TBR=mmoss@chromium.org > > Change-Id: I23aa116ccecf7b13eb6bf793a42475cd68555de0 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1424000 > Reviewed-by: chromium-internal-autoroll <chromium-internal-autoroll@skia-corp.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com> > Commit-Queue: chromium-internal-autoroll <chromium-internal-autoroll@skia-corp.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#624474} TBR=mmoss@chromium.org,chromium-internal-autoroll@skia-corp.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com Change-Id: Ib583d254068b247438f05f0e5bbde478416eea76 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1423923 Reviewed-by: Wez <wez@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Wez <wez@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#624475}
,
Today
(12 hours ago)
,
Today
(12 hours ago)
This was a revert of a src-internal roll which broke compilation on win32-rel; I don't see any way that it could be responsible for the performance regression referred to, unless the alert is bundling in some other changes that include something bad? |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Today (20 hours ago)