New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 923440 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 923363
Owner:
Closed: Today
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.1%-2.7% regression in rendering.mobile/thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame at 623128:623183

Project Member Reported by tdres...@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=923440

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=a7bd213a94e84d3dcb33a9d385961690fd01a4f7c5dc0d75ff9b24e6ef8fcf72


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Android Nexus6 WebView Perf

rendering.mobile - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/rendering-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 19 (3 days ago)

Cc: chromium...@skia-public.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Owner: g...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Unconfirmed)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/138aa86a540000

Roll AFDO from 73.0.3671.0_rc-r1 to 73.0.3672.0_rc-r1 by chromium-autoroll@skia-public.iam.gserviceaccount.com
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/2c7da71a5d429c476dbe4351fa3b8fdec82ecefa
frame_times: 123.1 → 128.5 (+5.408)

Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 73.0.3671.0_rc-r1 to 73.0.3672.0_rc-r1" is a roll.

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/rendering-benchmarks

Comment 4 by g...@chromium.org, Today (8 hours ago)

Mergedinto: 923363
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
Appears to be fixed by the roll in r624467. The roll in r622307 looks like the one that initially won us a decent chunk of CPU, then we regressed back to (perhaps) slightly worse than we used to be in r623150, then we won it all back.

This looks and sounds very similar to issue 923363, so I'm duping this against that.

Sign in to add a comment