Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1%-2.7% regression in rendering.mobile/thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame at 623128:623183 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 18
(4 days ago)
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/138aa86a540000
,
Jan 19
(3 days ago)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/138aa86a540000 Roll AFDO from 73.0.3671.0_rc-r1 to 73.0.3672.0_rc-r1 by chromium-autoroll@skia-public.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/2c7da71a5d429c476dbe4351fa3b8fdec82ecefa frame_times: 123.1 → 128.5 (+5.408) Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 73.0.3671.0_rc-r1 to 73.0.3672.0_rc-r1" is a roll. Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/rendering-benchmarks
,
Today
(8 hours ago)
Appears to be fixed by the roll in r624467. The roll in r622307 looks like the one that initially won us a decent chunk of CPU, then we regressed back to (perhaps) slightly worse than we used to be in r623150, then we won it all back. This looks and sounds very similar to issue 923363, so I'm duping this against that. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 18 (4 days ago)