Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.4%-13.2% regression in rendering.mobile/avg_surface_fps at 623065:623155 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 18
(4 days ago)
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16e6f9f6540000
,
Jan 18
(4 days ago)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16e6f9f6540000 Roll AFDO from 73.0.3671.0_rc-r1 to 73.0.3672.0_rc-r1 by chromium-autoroll@skia-public.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/2c7da71a5d429c476dbe4351fa3b8fdec82ecefa frame_times: 66.07 → 74.96 (+8.893) Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 73.0.3671.0_rc-r1 to 73.0.3672.0_rc-r1" is a roll. Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/rendering-benchmarks
,
Today
(8 hours ago)
Thanks! Looks like this was won back by the profile roll in r624467. Looking back, there appears to be occasional AFDO-induced spikes (initially in a good direction!) for avg_surface_fps starting at r619337. The other charts either have fewer or less-substantial jumps, so I'd imagine that there's one cause for this. Since this appears to be a loss of performance granted solely by a previous AFDO roll (rather than an outright regression in general), I don't have plans to try and force us back to a previous, unregressed profile before the branch.
,
Today
(8 hours ago)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 18 (4 days ago)