New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 923061 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Started
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Chrome
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

chrome_all_tast_tests fails on chromeos-amd64-generic-rel

Project Member Reported by afakhry@chromium.org, Jan 17 (5 days ago)

Issue description

- chromeos-amd64-generic-rel: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.ci/chromeos-amd64-generic-rel/24394

I don't see any useful errors in the logs, just the following: 

Test 'chrome_all_tast_tests' completed with the following status(es): 'FAILURE'

Test 'chrome_all_tast_tests' had the following logs when run:


bpastene@ do you have any ideas?

 

Comment 1 by afakhry@chromium.org, Jan 17 (5 days ago)

Summary: chrome_all_tast_tests fails on chromeos-amd64-generic-rel (was: chrome_all_tast_tests fails on )

Comment 2 by bpastene@chromium.org, Jan 17 (5 days ago)

from https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.ci/chromeos-amd64-generic-rel/24394

see the logs in "shard #0 (failed)" link under the test:
2019/01/17 08:04:49 Ran 17 test(s) in 7m9.439s
2019/01/17 08:04:49 2 failed:
2019/01/17 08:04:49   video.WebRTCCamera
2019/01/17 08:04:49   video.WebRTCPeerConnCameraVP8

go to the ui logs in its isolated out:
https://isolateserver.appspot.com/browse?namespace=default-gzip&digest=84ef067c949fcf7e8d55ce1e4291a74a5c2108bd&as=ui.20190117-155508

The browser is crashing with:
"ERROR:gpu_interface_provider.cc(87)] Not implemented reached in virtual void"

https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1362777 is in the blamelist of the build. Looks like it was failing like that for all but the last chromeos-amd64-generic-rel tryrun in the CQ. Not sure why the last one made it through..
Project Member

Comment 3 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jan 17 (5 days ago)

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054

commit 8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054
Author: Ben Pastene <bpastene@chromium.org>
Date: Thu Jan 17 18:29:12 2019

Revert "ozone: Remove mesa i965 same-fd workaround restriction"

This reverts commit 46eb9e2770083a3789d4bde29645f905a5a9c417.

Reason for revert: causing tast failures on amd64-generic VM bot

See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=923061#c2

Original change's description:
> ozone: Remove mesa i965 same-fd workaround restriction
> 
> NOTE: This is based on crrev.com/c/549576.
> 
> After Mesa same-fd for eglCreateImageKHR restriction was relaxed in
> crrev.com/c/378198/, it is now possible to remove the workaround in chromium.
> 
> The changes are as follows:
> 1. ClientNativePixmapDmaBuf can map multiple plane using multiple FDs.
> 2. GLImageNativePixmap can create EGLImage using multiple FDs.
> 3. GbmBuffer/GbmPixmap manages multiple FDs.
> 
> BUG= 642410 , 911370
> TEST=VDA unittest and VEA unittest
> TEST=Playback with Chrome ARC++ and ARC++ DRM L1 on kevin, hana, eve
> TEST=Playback with Chrome on peach_pit and nyan_big
> 
> Change-Id: I23848b8bcd0e240307633a5201b4b8e58b374282
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1362777
> Commit-Queue: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Robert Kroeger <rjkroege@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Cheng <dcheng@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Pawel Osciak <posciak@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#623686}

TBR=rjkroege@chromium.org,posciak@chromium.org,dcheng@chromium.org,dcastagna@chromium.org,hiroh@chromium.org

Change-Id: Ie9620b2022ec37ca5e55613d4fbe63247d357862
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug:  642410 , 911370, 923061
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1418124
Reviewed-by: Ben Pastene <bpastene@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Pastene <bpastene@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#623761}
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/components/arc/video_accelerator/gpu_arc_video_decode_accelerator.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_impl_native_pixmap.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/gpu/ipc/common/gpu_memory_buffer_impl_native_pixmap.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/media/gpu/v4l2/generic_v4l2_device.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/media/gpu/v4l2/v4l2_slice_video_decode_accelerator.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/media/gpu/v4l2/v4l2_video_decode_accelerator.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/gfx/linux/client_native_pixmap_dmabuf.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/gfx/linux/client_native_pixmap_dmabuf.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/gfx/native_pixmap.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/gl/gl_image_native_pixmap.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/gl/test/gl_image_test_template.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/ozone/common/linux/gbm_buffer.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/ozone/common/linux/gbm_wrapper.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/8ae71818cf945bea9f803e8a539e050da37ba054/ui/ozone/platform/drm/gpu/gbm_surface_factory.cc

Comment 4 by afakhry@chromium.org, Jan 17 (5 days ago)

video.WebRTCCamera is still failing on the most recent build: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.ci/chromeos-amd64-generic-rel/24404. Appears to be flaky.


2019/01/17 14:13:02 Ran 17 test(s) in 3m48.84s
2019/01/17 14:13:02 1 failed:
2019/01/17 14:13:02   video.WebRTCCamera

2019-01-17T14:12:30.474952-08:00 WARNING cros_camera_service[411]: StreamOn(): Failed to set V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO_PRIORITY
2019-01-17T14:12:30.476459-08:00 ERR cros_camera_service[411]: SetPowerLineFrequency(): Invalid setting for power line frequency: 4
2019-01-17T14:12:33.625702-08:00 INFO tast[411]: video.WebRTCCamera: Results: [{Width:640 Height:480 FrameStats:{TotalFrames:0 BlackFrames:0 FrozenFrames:0} Errors:[]} {Width:1280 Height:720 FrameStats:{TotalFrames:48 BlackFrames:0 FrozenFrames:0} Errors:[]}]
2019-01-17T14:12:33.628868-08:00 INFO tast[411]: video.WebRTCCamera: Error at webrtc.go:189: 640x480 was not healthy: no frame was displayed
2019-01-17T14:12:33.700336-08:00 INFO tast[411]: video.WebRTCCamera: ======== end

Seems there is a sig abort in the logs (which might be expected by the test?)

Received signal 6
Received signal Received signal 6
Received signal 6
6
#0 0x57a9abbde47f <unknown>
#1 0x57a9abbddff1 <unknown>
#2 0x7d20773ffab0 <unknown>
#3 0x7fff119d4aa3 ([vdso]+0xaa2)
#4 0x7d207685c3a9 __clock_gettime
#5 0x57a9abbf625a <unknown>
#6 0x57a9abb876d5 <unknown>
#7 0x57a9abb9777c <unknown>
#8 0x57a9abb89fbf <unknown>
#9 0x57a9abb8b532 <unknown>
#10 0x57a9abb96150 <unknown>
#11 0x57a9abb96731 <unknown>
#12 0x57a9abb51b67 <unknown>
#13 0x57a9abb96988 <unknown>
#14 0x57a9abb72d78 <unknown>
#15 0x57a9b021dbd4 <unknown>
#16 0x57a9ab7560ee <unknown>
#17 0x57a9ab75d6aa <unknown>
#18 0x57a9ab754e31 <unknown>
#19 0x57a9a90499af <unknown>
#20 0x7d2076770ad4 __libc_start_main
#21 0x57a9a8e6702a <unknown>
  r8: 0000000000000000  r9: 0000000000012926 r10: 023b88efd538a407 r11: 0000000000000246
 r12: 00007fff1191f418 r13: 00003bc7b22b9bd0 r14: 00007fff1191f638 r15: 00003bc7b22b57c0
  di: 0000000000000001  si: 00007fff1191f418  bp: 00007fff1191f400  bx: 0000000000000001
  dx: 0000000023b88efd  ax: 0000000000000000  cx: 00007fff119d4aa3  sp: 00007fff1191f3e0
  ip: 00007fff119d4aa3 efl: 0000000000000246 cgf: 002b000000000033 erf: 0000000000000000
 trp: 0000000000000000 msk: 0000000000000000 cr2: 0000000000000000
[end of stack trace]

2019-01-17T14:12:04.527011-08:00 INFO crash_reporter[411]: libminijail[8128]: mount '/dev/log' -> '/dev/log' type '' flags 0x1001
2019-01-17T14:12:04.611449-08:00 WARNING crash_reporter[411]: [user] Received crash notification for chrome[7619] sig 6, user 1000 group 1000 (ignoring call by kernel - chrome crash; waiting for chrome to call us directly)
2019-01-17T14:12:04.703893-08:00 INFO cros_camera_service[411]: OnServiceMojoChannelError(): Mojo connection to CameraHalDispatcher is broken
2019-01-17T14:12:04.713666-08:00 INFO cros_camera_service[411]: main(): Child exited: status=104
2019-01-17T14:12:04.719616-08:00 INFO crash_reporter[411]: libminijail[8131]: mount '/dev/log' -> '/dev/log' type '' flags 0x1001
2019-01-17T14:12:04.870714-08:00 WARNING crash_reporter[411]: [user] Received crash notification for chrome[7685] sig 6, user 1000 group 1000 (ignoring call by kernel - chrome crash; waiting for chrome to call us directly)
2019-01-17T14:12:05.750360-08:00 WARNING chapsd[411]: Unload Token event received for unknown path: /home/root/f16ec486a70a54db36a4bfce1283b2b2097bd36d/chaps
2019-01-17T14:12:05.758879-08:00 WARNING cryptohomed[411]: Lazily unmounting stale shadow mount: /run/fuse/.ctnv4a from /home/.shadow/f16ec486a70a54db36a4bfce1283b2b2097bd36d/mount/user/GCache/v2/8da7f253839391246504f0b792f88827
2019-01-17T14:12:05.810554-08:00 INFO tast[411]: video.WebRTCCamera: Clearing device owner info

Comment 5 by hiroh@chromium.org, Jan 18 (5 days ago)

Cc: bpastene@chromium.org tfiga@chromium.org keiichiw@chromium.org jcliang@chromium.org
Owner: hiroh@chromium.org
Hi, I am owner of the CL to be reverted.
Let me check.

Comment 6 by semenzato@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

We have a failure of video.WebRTCPeerConnCameraVP8 in a CQ run:

https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromeos/builders/luci.chromeos.general/CQ/b8924020616259276592

Is it related to this, or is it some flake ("failed to connect to Chrome")?
A quick reply would be appreciated so I can exculpate the CLs.

Comment 8 by semenzato@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Cc: -jcliang@chromium.org vapier@chromium.org jjclinton@chromium.org
Is anybody looking into this?  This (or these) bugs have killed the CQ and PFQ, so it's fairly urgent.

Here's a snippet from the failure in #7.  It looks different, but it's suspicious that these camera tests fail so much, maybe there's a common cause.
 
019/01/18 11:32:52 [11:32:50.873] Creating new page with URL http://127.0.0.1:37013/getusermedia.html
2019/01/18 11:32:52 [11:32:50.946] Connecting to Chrome at ws://127.0.0.1:41269/devtools/page/61BF577224B8F35C2296820B1A227DF7
2019/01/18 11:34:21 [11:34:20.127] Error at webrtc.go:61: Failed to evaluate enumerateDevicesError: cdp.Runtime: Evaluate: context deadline exceeded
2019/01/18 11:34:21 [11:34:20.127] Stack trace:
Failed to evaluate enumerateDevicesError
	at chromiumos/tast/local/bundles/cros/video/webrtc.runTest (webrtc.go:61)
	at chromiumos/tast/local/bundles/cros/video/webrtc.RunWebRTCCamera (webrtc.go:177)
	at chromiumos/tast/local/bundles/cros/video.WebRTCCamera (webrtc_camera.go:37)

Comment 9 by derat@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Cc: nya@chromium.org
#6: The failure at https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromeos/builders/luci.chromeos.general/CQ/b8924020616259276592 ("Failed to connect to Chrome: OOBE not dismissed: context deadline exceeded; last error follows: chrome://oobe target still exists") indicates an issue during Chrome login that's likely unrelated to what video.WebRTCPeerConnCameraVP8 is trying to investigate. Please ask the gardener to take a look; that's their job.

The failure from #7 that you quoted in #8 is indeed different and suggests an issue in the functionality that the test is trying to verify (or in the test itself). If you can't get a reply from someone on the video team and you can't find any evidence that the failures were triggered by a change that's in the CQ or a recent Chrome uprev, please temporarily add an "informational" attribute to the test so it won't run on the CQ and PFQ (see http://go/tast-failures).

Comment 10 by afakhry@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Cc: jdufault@chromium.org alemate@chromium.org
- video.WebRTCPeerConnCameraVP8 is indeed failing as derat@ mentioned with:

[23:09:41.313] Error at webrtc.go:41: Failed to connect to Chrome: OOBE not dismissed: context deadline exceeded; last error follows: chrome://oobe target still exists

- Looking at the chrome logs, I can see:

[8106:8106:0117/230948.142237:ERROR:device_event_log_impl.cc(159)] [23:09:48.142] Network: network_portal_detector_impl.cc:483 Portal detection timeout:  name=Ethernet id=e422d235-2128-4159-860f-453fcf1e3628
[8106:8106:0117/230953.143243:WARNING:error_screen.cc(202)] Network error screen message is shown
[8106:8106:0117/231005.505912:ERROR:device_event_log_impl.cc(159)] [23:10:05.505] Network: network_portal_detector_impl.cc:483 Portal detection timeout:  name=Ethernet id=e422d235-2128-4159-860f-453fcf1e3628
[8106:8106:0117/231010.507718:WARNING:error_screen.cc(202)] Network error screen message is shown

- With matching timestamps. Maybe that's why OOBE was not dismissed? +jdufault@ +alemate@


- There are also several empty crash dmp.txt files which suggests minidump_stackwalk failed to symbolize these crashes:

chromium-gpu-process-minidump-37051d45e1eb85bb.dmp.txt

- There's also the infamous kernel panic reported at issue 871915.

[  156.288384] [<c031eb98>] (namespace_unlock+0xbc/0x114) from [<c03210a0>] (put_mnt_ns+0x64/0x78)
[  156.288396] [<c03210a0>] (put_mnt_ns+0x64/0x78) from [<c024df50>] (free_nsproxy+0x28/0xc4)
[  156.288409] [<c024df50>] (free_nsproxy+0x28/0xc4) from [<c024e1ec>] (switch_task_namespaces+0x64/0x68)
[  156.288421] [<c024e1ec>] (switch_task_namespaces+0x64/0x68) from [<c024e20c>] (exit_task_namespaces+0x1c/0x20)
[  156.288433] [<c024e20c>] (exit_task_namespaces+0x1c/0x20) from [<c022a2f8>] (do_exit+0x390/0x89c)
[  156.288444] [<c022a2f8>] (do_exit+0x390/0x89c) from [<c022b764>] (do_group_exit+0x5c/0xc0)
[  156.288454] [<c022b764>] (do_group_exit+0x5c/0xc0) from [<c022b7e8>] (__wake_up_parent+0x0/0x30)
[  156.288466] [<c022b7e8>] (__wake_up_parent+0x0/0x30) from [<c0205f60>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30)
[  156.288476] Code: e5943010 e594800c e5844008 e584300c (e5973090) 
[  156.288484] ---[ end trace b57b8a4f5876fe26 ]---
[  156.290063] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

Comment 11 by vapier@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Cc: -vapier@chromium.org

Comment 12 by keiichiw@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Cc: shik@chromium.org jcliang@chromium.org
#7: It seems that an external camera isn't detected properly. (Here, the external camera is vivid.)

Error at webrtc.go:65: Timed out waiting for video device to be available: context deadline exceeded; last error follows: "!!(checkVideoInput())" is false

https://00e9e64bacf0c4c595772a4265e925c5e71f64c9de21d3dd82-apidata.googleusercontent.com/download/storage/v1/b/chromeos-image-archive/o/amd64-generic-paladin%2FR73-11606.0.0-rc2%2Ftast_vm_test_results_2%2Ftast_vm_paladin%2Ffull.txt?qk=AD5uMEuhM5i9NHabrPLOsltyWqsRo8JWYe43bPUFUc4bYh7-0fKq8agSn8WL0b1GMdnBXWpltPJ4WZ3DphA4ziacULAwYWpZMenGR6hlO6rq2ae2w_630VpwLK8M-ka9u1fvjLuBDK3TjTxUcT6n6HzayrRi9vaAzgJ-Y1bKY0NE0WS9VosLfmCmlSY30tpgLyjtRjYLuKL01NhGMBhGtqzCm5bY59utrhqwfyKf7hzyM79y45QPkpCbN8_FDtzOUuOgFxR1PB2fmN0y3Y5bgMKBnoKDW-CaTTr8yEtLpB6JrCl3L2JEtWL55MJI8oz4jfDI6Nlab5I7dMpSrdEgyMaRpIdQslJcXR1u12VoQW3sFs9oIXSUIj_bwWsdIQWLr5ifbqz7TMHUK2YFnSI4IsJSpnr8MKCC0aEgTnNDfd8QyruSs0552W6ogN1UE3_gLKPgaGl0pKEePh5zQY6WtXQ0UDYHmyKIHiVSOHjBXFp7xpiOvMbvN0eB6UkyCfRNLu45jk2CXYYA9tJctJtPjK7UrwEyErhJkxr-RenBZcqJqkkNglmR-Xt_MmtRqp_8BP4lwoG5wq-jxezzE_j-VJq0E3qHQJedORTON0JBzL3UAM1QQf4UvpOfyITxn97erpU6Ia0JoB-VJCbe0Uq0GcB0M9vvWssqijwzwnqrYFztFbw4EnpxYzWMQdfUf1e2e09Xnr9MjvVwG-sPj9PUFqfcjtB00-HVqvBjdFTFm9dO9xwheO1MV07M4kSvGipshhuvSa2z_fOOKVSV_6lxeHkq2wRUOTED1GH-K7rHXkB4KtNIJQhDQIga3KQiuge55iD6nhOpyhGE_0pS78HfxJ9mw0eSDp3u4mqP40cL2CYCHmfX6ylJ_W4yo4mHGKmKxcVydOWAIp5s

I have no idea if we have changed related parts recently.
+CC'd camera folks.

Comment 13 by bpastene@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

> This (or these) bugs have killed the CQ and PFQ, so it's fairly urgent.

The (chromium) CQ appears fine. Don't see any flakes on the trybot:
https://luci-milo.appspot.com/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/chromeos-amd64-generic-rel?limit=200

And the waterfall bot is clean:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.ci/chromeos-amd64-generic-rel

We can easily disable WebRTCPeerConnCameraVP8 on the chromium bots if needed, but I'm not seeing it block anything right now.

Comment 14 by semenzato@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

Thanks.  CL at https://crrev.com/c/1422881

Note that at least some of these failures are on amd64-generic-paladin.  I don't know what kind of HW that is and whether it has a camera.

Comment 15 by derat@chromium.org, Jan 18 (4 days ago)

#14: amd64-generic builders use VMs (they're the same as betty but without ARC, as I understand it), so they'd probably also be using the vivid module.

Comment 16 by jcliang@google.com, Jan 19 (4 days ago)

Cc: henryhsu@chromium.org
Owner: henryhsu@chromium.org
The failure may be related to https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/arc-camera/+/1405216/.

We recently had this CL to filter out camera output resolutions that < 30fps. We should limit the filtering to built-in cameras.

Let's set the WebRtcCamera test to informational while we prepare the fix. The WebRtcCamera test should probably be added to Chromium OS CQ test as well.


Comment 17 by semenzato@chromium.org, Jan 19 (4 days ago)

The CL is ready to go, I can chump it any time (or you can too).  Is there much upside to NOT chumping it?

Comment 18 by jcliang@chromium.org, Jan 19 (4 days ago)

I just checked the CQ and Chrome PFQ and they seem fine at the moment. From stainless the tast.video.WebRTCCamera looks healthy as well.

https://stainless.corp.google.com/search?test=%5Etast%5C.video%5C.WebRTCCamera%24&exclude_non_release=true&exclude_cts=true&col=build&row=board_model&view=matrix&first_date=2019-01-13&last_date=2019-01-19

So I'm not sure if we need to disable the test. If WebRTCCamera failure is a tree blocker then we shall chump the CL to unblock the CQ/PFQ.

Comment 19 by semenzato@chromium.org, Jan 19 (3 days ago)

OK, let's not chump this the time being, since it hasn't failed again.

However, I recommend fixing this quickly.  Even a rare flake is hurtful.  Last week the CQ succeeded only a handful of times, but only one failure was due to a bad CL.

Comment 20 by henryhsu@chromium.org, Yesterday (46 hours ago)

Status: Started (was: Assigned)

Comment 21 by tangltom@chromium.org, Yesterday (41 hours ago)

chrome_all_tast_tests seems to fail again multiple times: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.ci/chromeos-amd64-generic-rel


Comment 22 by derat@chromium.org, Yesterday (41 hours ago)

#21: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.ci/chromeos-amd64-generic-rel/24509 looks like it was the same video.WebRTCCamera failure as in #4:

2019/01/21 03:57:37 Running video.WebRTCCamera
2019/01/21 03:57:37 Restarting ui job
2019/01/21 03:57:40 Clearing device owner info
2019/01/21 03:57:41 Waiting for org.chromium.SessionManager D-Bus service
2019/01/21 03:57:41 Asking session_manager to enable Chrome testing
2019/01/21 03:57:41 Waiting for Chrome to write its debugging port to /home/chronos/DevToolsActivePort
2019/01/21 03:57:42 Removing cryptohome for testuser@gmail.com
2019/01/21 03:57:42 Finding OOBE DevTools target
2019/01/21 03:57:42 Connecting to Chrome at ws://127.0.0.1:35991/devtools/page/13EF6D448BF0F19296293BB9E3457540
2019/01/21 03:57:42 Waiting for OOBE
2019/01/21 03:57:49 Logging in as user "testuser@gmail.com"
2019/01/21 03:57:50 Waiting for cryptohome for user "testuser@gmail.com"
2019/01/21 03:57:58 Waiting for OOBE to be dismissed
2019/01/21 03:58:01 Creating new page with URL http://127.0.0.1:39781/getusermedia.html
2019/01/21 03:58:01 Connecting to Chrome at ws://127.0.0.1:35991/devtools/page/0BFECD466F42E58134D15C8381CEC778
2019/01/21 03:58:11 Results: [{Width:640 Height:480 FrameStats:{TotalFrames:0 BlackFrames:0 FrozenFrames:0} Errors:[]} {Width:1280 Height:720 FrameStats:{TotalFrames:24 BlackFrames:0 FrozenFrames:0} Errors:[]}]
2019/01/21 03:58:11 Error: [webrtc.go:189] 640x480 was not healthy: no frame was displayed
2019/01/21 03:58:11 Finished video.WebRTCCamera

Comment 23 by derat@chromium.org, Yesterday (41 hours ago)

Labels: -Restrict-View-Google
I don't see any reason for this issue to have Restrict-View-Google.
Project Member

Comment 24 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Yesterday (40 hours ago)

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/tast-tests/+/e2253754392cfd9b8ff4be25e381876e97a11f03

commit e2253754392cfd9b8ff4be25e381876e97a11f03
Author: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@chromium.org>
Date: Mon Jan 21 13:33:58 2019

tast-tests: Make video.WebRTCCamera informational temporarily.

Temporary fix until we find out why it fails in various builds.

BUG=chromium:923061
TEST=ran on DUT

Change-Id: Id128e18c41068e8e4e4c087c43330e2a3b2147f2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1422881
Tested-by: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Erat <derat@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Takahashi <nya@chromium.org>

[modify] https://crrev.com/e2253754392cfd9b8ff4be25e381876e97a11f03/src/chromiumos/tast/local/bundles/cros/video/webrtc_camera.go

Comment 25 by jcliang@chromium.org, Yesterday (40 hours ago)

I chumped CL:1422881 to avoid the WebRTCCamera from blocking CQ. Henry has a fix CL:1423891 in the CQ. Let's re-enable the test after we verify the fix.

Sign in to add a comment