Null-dereference WRITE in webrtc::video_coding::DecodedFramesHistory::InsertDecoded |
||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6263611760312320 Fuzzer: libFuzzer_frame_buffer2_fuzzer Fuzz target binary: frame_buffer2_fuzzer Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_asan Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Null-dereference WRITE Crash Address: 0x000000000000 Crash State: webrtc::video_coding::DecodedFramesHistory::InsertDecoded webrtc::video_coding::FrameBuffer::NextFrame webrtc::FuzzOneInput Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=622697:622701 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6263611760312320 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for instructions to reproduce this bug locally.
,
Jan 16
(6 days ago)
Automatically adding ccs based on OWNERS file / target commit history. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label.
,
Jan 16
(6 days ago)
Automatically adding ccs based on suspected regression changelists: Introduce DecodedFramesHistory class and use it in FrameBuffer by ilnik@webrtc.org - https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/13717842dfcf39c310ad5825fa0689511a922dd4 If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label.
,
Jan 16
(6 days ago)
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 623008:623051. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6263611760312320 Fuzzer: libFuzzer_frame_buffer2_fuzzer Fuzz target binary: frame_buffer2_fuzzer Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_asan Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Null-dereference WRITE Crash Address: 0x000000000000 Crash State: webrtc::video_coding::DecodedFramesHistory::InsertDecoded webrtc::video_coding::FrameBuffer::NextFrame webrtc::FuzzOneInput Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=622697:622701 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=623008:623051 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6263611760312320 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for instructions to reproduce this bug locally. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Jan 16
(6 days ago)
ClusterFuzz testcase 6263611760312320 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Jan 16 (6 days ago)