New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 921172 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner:
Closed: Today
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

12.9%-23.4% regression in blink_perf.dom at 619199:619262

Project Member Reported by m...@chromium.org, Jan 11

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=921172

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=33a2640c52c107120395f237086ba5071292d05da3837a8bf2479ce06432a441


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf

blink_perf.dom - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks

blink_perf.layout - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
Cc: chrishtr@chromium.org
Owner: chrishtr@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Unconfirmed)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/17826cb3940000

Move dirty bits for visual overflow recalc into PaintLayer by chrishtr@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/d8ebabeb38aae2a0f18e2f8e843ed069080037b5
add-remove-inline-floats: 214.1 → 197.5 (-16.58)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks

Comment 4 by chrishtr@chromium.org, Today (5 hours ago)

Mergedinto: 918598
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment