New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 919971 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 8
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

19.4%-25.9% regression in blink_perf.paint at 608971:609061

Project Member Reported by maxlg@google.com, Jan 8

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=919971

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=81d08705c3edda64722e38a8cbca95e651e309b3078788da6f40526fa6650458


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf

blink_perf.paint - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
Mergedinto: 907146
Status: Duplicate (was: Unconfirmed)
Cc: maxlg@chromium.org
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/116581d9940000

[FCP++] Enable FCP++ metrics via finch experiment by maxlg@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/4e243fc4a328acee8354c73e7c9df2facac9f3f7
move-text-with-mask: 1713 → 2111 (+397.9)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks

Sign in to add a comment