New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 918541 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: Duplicate
Owner:
fmalita@chromium.org
Closed: Jan 3
Cc:
fmalita@chromium.org
lanwei@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.7%-80.2% regression in rasterize_and_record_micro.top_25 at 618817:618843

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, Jan 2 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 2 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=918541

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=a0cee727478520ccd6a1f56e48b6af09d9f8d6f877e1da78491d4cab0375d1e0


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Android Nexus5 Perf
Android Nexus6 WebView Perf
Win 7 Nvidia GPU Perf
Win 7 Perf
android-nexus5x-perf
mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

rasterize_and_record_micro.top_25 - Benchmark documentation link:
  None
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 2

Cc: fmalita@chromium.org
Owner: fmalita@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14cba64a940000

Update shadow blur-radius computations by fmalita@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/909793b85dd2eb0bd37954ec50fbc86d547be50a
rasterize_time: 4.585 → 8.243 (+3.658)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  None

Comment 4 by fmalita@chromium.org, Jan 3

Mergedinto: 918543
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
►

Sign in to add a comment