Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Background cover bug
Reported by
dize...@gmail.com,
Dec 28
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.102 YaBrowser/18.11.1.716 Yowser/2.5 Safari/537.36 Example URL: https://jsfiddle.net/dizel3d/gahwykt6/ Steps to reproduce the problem: Run the example https://jsfiddle.net/dizel3d/gahwykt6/ What is the expected behavior? All divs should be green like in Safari or Firefox. What went wrong? Some divs are red or transparent. Does it occur on multiple sites: Yes Is it a problem with a plugin? No Did this work before? N/A Does this work in other browsers? Yes Chrome version: 70.0.3538.102 Channel: n/a OS Version: OS X 10.13.6 Flash Version: Looks like a bug with CSS `background: cover` for tiny images.
,
Jan 2
[Reverse Bisect]Able to reproduce the issue on reported chrome 70.0.3538.102 however issue seems to be fixed in latest chrome canary 73.0.3658.0 using Mac 10.12, Windows 10 and Ubuntu 17.10 with steps mentioned in comment# 0,hence providing reverse bisect info Reverse Bisect Info: ================ Bad build: 72.0.3610.0 Good build:72.0.3611.0 Change Log:https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/0248b7e5e62389c0e7f43a2e5cba5f74d7a658e0..0eaa27d31b4d727a10363cc2ef000b84438d9696 Suspecting:https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/0eaa27d31b4d727a10363cc2ef000b84438d9696 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1334291 @schenney: Please confirm the issue and help in re-assigning if it is not related to your change Adding Release-Block-Stable as this is recent regression. Please feel free to remove if not applicable. Thanks!
,
Jan 2
Yes, this bug was fixed for M-72 but not merged back. There is a workaround which is to use larger images. See the duplicate bug. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by swarnasree.mukkala@chromium.org
, Dec 31