Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
35.4%-37.3% regression in blink_perf.layout at 613708:614282 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 20
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/120de51e140000
,
Dec 20
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/120de51e140000 OOP-R: GrContext::flush and glFlush at every DoRasterCHROMIUM by ccameron@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/b2615d69395f6922a2d5b727045cfd70b73445fe large-table-with-collapsed-borders-and-no-colspans: 1949 → 2762 (+812.4) Disable the new tab-loading animation by pbos@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/355b8185716292a8f145c77168ee89148ecabf31 large-table-with-collapsed-borders-and-no-colspans: 2754 → 2832 (+77.27) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
,
Dec 20
-> ccameron@, since their increase is larger. We needed to disable the new tab-loading animation so I don't think my part of this is actionable? |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 20