New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 916108 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 20
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 3
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Bisecting memory improvement in 615295:615327

Project Member Reported by perezju@chromium.org, Dec 18

Issue description

Issue 915660 has been merged into this issue.
Cc: cricke@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13ff04a1140000

Roll src/clank 3a6fac8b3e6d..01993c05e782 (1 commits) by chromium-internal-autoroll@skia-corp.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com
https://chrome-internal.googlesource.com/chrome/src-internal/+/2f5601601a8a5d6fd4219bed476b6ca5d0728e52
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:proportional_resident_size: 1.077e+08 → 1.043e+08 (-3.476e+06)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
Cc: pasko@chromium.org
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
So the reason for the improvement is on Dec 12th is:

2018-12-10 clank-buildbot@google.com Update Orderfile.
https://chrome-internal.googlesource.com/clank/internal/apps.git/+/01993c05e782a2bc2e5807a2402c856cad0fd034

+pasko FYI - do you know what was the work that enabled this improvement?
Cc: mattcary@chromium.org
roughly aligns with 04f4103842f32cee0b6206b96797a1b622642f60, the amount is also according to expectations
Mergedinto: 913436
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)
oops, sent the message too early ..

Thank you, Juan for nailing it with a bisect!

Sign in to add a comment