Abrt in webrtc::video_coding::RtpFrameObject::RtpFrameObject |
||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5424238464598016 Fuzzer: afl_rtp_frame_reference_finder_fuzzer Fuzz target binary: rtp_frame_reference_finder_fuzzer Job Type: afl_chrome_asan Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Abrt Crash Address: 0x05390014eb7e Crash State: webrtc::video_coding::RtpFrameObject::RtpFrameObject webrtc_fuzzer_main.cc ExecuteFilesOnyByOne Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=afl_chrome_asan&range=591170:591178 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5424238464598016 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for instructions to reproduce this bug locally.
,
Dec 16
Automatically adding ccs based on suspected regression changelists: Added is_last_packet_in_frame to match is_first_packet_in_frame. by philipel@webrtc.org - https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/ef615ea7a3960f13aeb341e9a76e627aff875238 If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label.
,
Dec 21
As predator provided 1 possible suspect Suspect CL: https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/ef615ea7a3960f13aeb341e9a76e627aff875238 Assiging it to philipel@
,
Dec 21
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 618408:618430. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5424238464598016 Fuzzer: afl_rtp_frame_reference_finder_fuzzer Fuzz target binary: rtp_frame_reference_finder_fuzzer Job Type: afl_chrome_asan Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Abrt Crash Address: 0x05390014eb7e Crash State: webrtc::video_coding::RtpFrameObject::RtpFrameObject webrtc_fuzzer_main.cc ExecuteFilesOnyByOne Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=afl_chrome_asan&range=591170:591178 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=afl_chrome_asan&range=618408:618430 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5424238464598016 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for instructions to reproduce this bug locally. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Dec 21
ClusterFuzz testcase 5424238464598016 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.
,
Dec 27
Philip, seems like we're hitting a correct CHECK, if you agree, could you add the ClusterFuzz-Wrong label? |
||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Dec 16Labels: ClusterFuzz-Auto-CC