New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 913587 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

12.6%-15.4% regression in blink_perf.layout at 613952:614296

Project Member Reported by npm@chromium.org, Dec 10

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=913587

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=93155924f4a7bd7291b101076fbadf410c4eb675851c7169e26705c240febbe1


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

blink_perf.layout - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
Cc: ccameron@chromium.org
Owner: ccameron@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/105a4f4a140000

OOP-R: GrContext::flush and glFlush at every DoRasterCHROMIUM by ccameron@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/b2615d69395f6922a2d5b727045cfd70b73445fe
large-table-with-collapsed-borders-and-colspans-wider-than-table: 1794 → 2034 (+239.9)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks

Sign in to add a comment