New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 913505 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: WontFix
Owner:
wangxianzhu@chromium.org
Closed: Dec 14
Cc:
wangxianzhu@chromium.org
npm@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

7.3% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 604544:610161

Project Member Reported by npm@chromium.org, Dec 10 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 10 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=913505

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=6403d76a2faef82433a8720c8f893943feed242fb179c279d279689bc25aaaad


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Win 7 Nvidia GPU Perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 13

Cc: wangxianzhu@chromium.org
Owner: wangxianzhu@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13f5019c140000

[CI] Make HitTestDisplayItem not DrawingDisplayItem by wangxianzhu@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9067dfa6774b72cf1e20a1441dd83eb0b9867c67
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size: 5.727e+06 → 5.942e+06 (+2.158e+05)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks

Comment 4 by wangxianzhu@chromium.org, Dec 14

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
The CL actually reduced memory usage, which affects skia memory caching. The increased memory is purgable.
►

Sign in to add a comment