New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 913461 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: Duplicate
Owner:
u...@chromium.org
Closed: Dec 12
Cc:
petermarshall@google.com
u...@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.2%-8.8% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 613962:614208

Project Member Reported by petermarshall@google.com, Dec 10 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 10 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=913461

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=841266a8c76801946eaf7d85e955d0efa0a5557070efc86715071a1fbf72227e


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Win 7 Nvidia GPU Perf
mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 12

Cc: u...@chromium.org
Owner: u...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/11569832140000

Do not pretenure descriptor arrays. by ulan@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/92e228534a472c5ff55f7ed536f5c6ba7daccedb
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size: 2.264e+07 → 2.462e+07 (+1.984e+06)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks

Comment 4 by u...@chromium.org, Dec 12

Mergedinto: 913482
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
►

Sign in to add a comment