CHECK failure: !next_sibling || next_sibling->IsBox() in layout_block_flow.cc |
|||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5353842885263360 Fuzzer: bj_broddelwerk Job Type: linux_asan_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: !next_sibling || next_sibling->IsBox() in layout_block_flow.cc blink::LayoutBlockFlow::LayoutBlockChildren blink::LayoutBlockFlow::LayoutChildren Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=571854:571855 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5353842885263360 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Dec 9
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/a6398c42c34e5ed2bd06c0b7f453e6d7c24de973 (<rp> element should be display:none). If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label. If you aren't the correct owner for this issue, please unassign yourself as soon as possible so it can be re-triaged.
,
Dec 27
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 618985:618986. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5353842885263360 Fuzzer: bj_broddelwerk Job Type: linux_asan_content_shell_drt Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: !next_sibling || next_sibling->IsBox() in layout_block_flow.cc blink::LayoutBlockFlow::LayoutBlockChildren blink::LayoutBlockFlow::LayoutChildren Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=571854:571855 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=618985:618986 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5353842885263360 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for instructions to reproduce this bug locally. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Dec 27
ClusterFuzz testcase 5353842885263360 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
|||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Dec 9Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components