Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
19.3% regression in blink_perf.shadow_dom at 612522:612639 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 4
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/127c9b2c140000
,
Dec 4
😿 Pinpoint job stopped with an error. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/127c9b2c140000 All of the runs failed. The most common error (19/20 runs) was: SwarmingTestError: The test failed. No Python exception was found in the log.
,
Jan 10
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12fd5925940000
,
Jan 10
Requesting another pinpoint run.
,
Jan 10
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12fd5925940000 Guard fast flat tree traversal (fftt) by runtime flag by hayato@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/d9cba271a2ad1761f12731887bb4427fa7719da2 v1-mutate-shallow-tree-then-slot-flatten: 19.96 → 23.19 (+3.226) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
,
Jan 11
It looks an *expected* regression. I should have clarified that in the CL. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 4