New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 911583 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Assigned
Owner:
hirosh...@chromium.org
Cc:
h...@chromium.org
hirosh...@chromium.org
toyoshim@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3%-16.9% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 612650:612758

Project Member Reported by toyoshim@chromium.org, Dec 4 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 4 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=911583

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=070f1eb001be58059d8e95dcf7265238728c7501bf60bd897e6b62307dbf5880


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-perf
mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 5

Cc: hirosh...@chromium.org h...@chromium.org
Owner: hirosh...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/110bad8fe40000

Roll clang 346388:347933. by hans@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/0bdd3c25975f763d121802a092c1ef0925049976
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size: 5.79e+05 → No values

Revert "Roll clang 346388:347933." by hiroshige@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/835d0fdea0f19000edf8766a4e299704586be44d
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size: No values → 6.558e+05

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
►

Sign in to add a comment