New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 911483 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 910352
Owner:
Closed: Jan 9
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

20.1%-130.9% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 611876:612059

Project Member Reported by toyoshim@chromium.org, Dec 4

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=911483

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=52f24285275a019d389cd18d32d4c548a2484a7ac06a4bff1b99e2c97f1e9f75


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Cc: khushals...@chromium.org
Owner: khushals...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/12d29547e40000

gpu: Disable CCPR for OOP raster. by khushalsagar@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/193eda157bdb1c66d9afdc9c54a36e0ccc249293
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size: 2.162e+06 → 5.334e+06 (+3.172e+06)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Mergedinto: 910352
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment