New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 910242 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
verwa...@chromium.org
Closed: Nov 30
Cc:
verwa...@chromium.org
majidvp@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.8%-5.2% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 611342:611455

Project Member Reported by majidvp@google.com, Nov 29 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 29 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=910242

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=f88058780988fec373b6f6f49451b17740b36e840d0db41189265ddf3e2c5352


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 29

Cc: verwa...@chromium.org
Owner: verwa...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/172d7697e40000

[zone] Revert to previous zone allocation strategies due to severe memory regressions. by verwaest@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/de20e6d3a855d7dc4a991dd192052c30b6ea996e
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size: 8.286e+07 → 8.883e+07 (+5.966e+06)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks

Comment 4 by verwa...@chromium.org, Nov 30

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Due to revert
►

Sign in to add a comment