New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 909057 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 908359
Owner:
Closed: Nov 28
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.1%-6.3% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 610565:610694

Project Member Reported by m...@chromium.org, Nov 28

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=909057

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=c705d8cadb9b32e187145c8dadec05e5b09336358145ba55b1abdd8cb20920f2


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-perf
mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Cc: verwa...@chromium.org
Owner: verwa...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16c915d3e40000

[zone] Use 32kb instead of 1MB as high zone page size by verwaest@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/a04862021eee7708335eea0ce81531f999b5e66c
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_footprint_size: 2.681e+08 → 2.839e+08 (+1.579e+07)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Mergedinto: 908359
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment