New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 907561 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Chrome
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Direct-leak in GLSLFastFuzzTask

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Nov 21

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5156738015428608

Fuzzer: libFuzzer_dawn_spirv_cross_msl_fast_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_asan
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Direct-leak
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  GLSLFastFuzzTask
  DawnSPIRVCrossFuzzer::ExecuteWithSignalTrap
  GLSLFastFuzzTask
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=609745:609751

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5156738015428608

Issue filed automatically.

See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/testing/libfuzzer/reference.md for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Nov 21

Cc: kainino@chromium.org cwallez@chromium.org
Labels: ClusterFuzz-Auto-CC
Automatically adding ccs based on OWNERS file / target commit history.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label.
Project Member

Comment 2 by ClusterFuzz, Nov 21

Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Owner
Owner: rharrison@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://dawn.googlesource.com/dawn/+/fbeca676d409ec19572e3299288f4010c2ee8fd5 (Tighten when signal trap is used in SPIRV-Cross fuzzers).

If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label. If you aren't the correct owner for this issue, please unassign yourself as soon as possible so it can be re-triaged.
Components: Internals>GPU>Dawn
Project Member

Comment 4 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 1

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5156738015428608 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. The testcase is still reproducible. This happened due to a code refactoring on ClusterFuzz side, and the underlying root cause is now fixed. Resetting the label back to Reproducible. Sorry about the inconvenience caused from these incorrect notifications.
Project Member

Comment 6 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 4

Labels: OS-Chrome

Sign in to add a comment