New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 907080 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Windows
Pri: 2
Type: Feature



Sign in to add a comment

In Win Chrome, Variable fonts render differently to static fonts

Reported by m.foley...@googlemail.com, Nov 20

Issue description

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.102 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce the problem:
In Win Chrome, go to http://159.65.243.73/compare/2b0c0d01-8ef5-4ed2-89e5-25609b0b84c3

This test page compares two fonts, a static ttf against a variable font. Both fonts and diff images are attached.

What is the expected behavior?
I would expect the variable fonts in this test case to match the static fonts.

We can see there is a cap height jump at 8pt in the image, diff_images/waterfall/gifs/Desktop_Windows_10_chrome_69.0_.gif.

What went wrong?
Win Chrome uses FreeType to render variables fonts, whilst for static fonts, it uses DW. It would be nice to have the appearance of VFs be as close as possible to the static fonts.

Did this work before? N/A 

Chrome version: 70.0.3538.102  Channel: n/a
OS Version: 10
Flash Version: 

The test case I'm attaching contains the two fonts used in the "Steps to reproduce..." section.

The variable font was built from the static font by inserting an fvar table. I also had to add name table entries for the fvar so it would pass ots-sanitizer.
 
vf_vs_static_chrome_test_case.zip
2.1 MB Download
Components: Blink>Fonts
Owner: drott@chromium.org
Labels: Needs-Triage-M70
Cc: phanindra.mandapaka@chromium.org
Labels: Triaged-ET Target-72 M-72 FoundIn-71 FoundIn-70 FoundIn-72
Status: Untriaged (was: Unconfirmed)
Thanks for filing the issue!

As per comment# 0 from the reporter, issue seems to be a Feature request, hence marking it as Untriaged and adding appropriate labels to it.

Thanks!
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment