Out-of-memory in skia_image_filter_proto_fuzzer |
||||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5395093807431680 Fuzzer: libFuzzer_skia_image_filter_proto_fuzzer Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_asan Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Out-of-memory (exceeds 2048 MB) Crash Address: Crash State: skia_image_filter_proto_fuzzer Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=533300:533313 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5395093807431680 Issue filed automatically. See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/testing/libfuzzer/reference.md for more information.
,
Nov 17
Automatically adding ccs based on OWNERS file / target commit history. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label.
,
Nov 20
,
Nov 22
,
Dec 1
ClusterFuzz testcase 5395093807431680 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
,
Dec 1
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. The testcase is still reproducible. This happened due to a code refactoring on ClusterFuzz side, and the underlying root cause is now fixed. Resetting the label back to Reproducible. Sorry about the inconvenience caused from these incorrect notifications.
,
Dec 6
,
Jan 16
(6 days ago)
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 623222:623224. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5395093807431680 Fuzzer: libFuzzer_skia_image_filter_proto_fuzzer Fuzz target binary: skia_image_filter_proto_fuzzer Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_asan Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Out-of-memory (exceeds 2048 MB) Crash Address: Crash State: skia_image_filter_proto_fuzzer Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=533300:533313 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=623222:623224 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5395093807431680 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for instructions to reproduce this bug locally. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Jan 16
(6 days ago)
ClusterFuzz testcase 5395093807431680 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Nov 17