Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1%-28.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 603866:607727 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 15
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/15bfbebbe40000
,
Nov 15
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/15bfbebbe40000 Adding GooglePlayStoreDesktop system_health media browsing story. by mbarowsky@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/28c2d1ac39edb99342b900bf69142beee070936e timeToFirstPaint: 268.5 → 200.6 (-67.9) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
,
Nov 15
That commit was for adding a system_health Desktop story, so it is expected to increase memory usage for Desktop. In the performance graphs, I don't see a negative effect to memory_mobile.
,
Nov 19
@kouhei Can I mark this as "WontFix"?
,
Nov 21
Yes, looks like there is no negative impact. I think something went wrong with the alert UI. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 15