New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 903765 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner:
Closed: Nov 9
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

14.6%-46.7% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 606388:606413

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Nov 9

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=903765

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=a81fc5760eaa75c1a572172ada4584039badb15113c151c3b17f25a44776ea29


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Cc: khushals...@chromium.org
Owner: khushals...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/16f0cb3be40000

cc/gpu: Add client driven paint caching for OOP raster. by khushalsagar@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/33205a780d892f1ae0af639fd57a339f44093f9a
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size: 2.453e+07 → 3.566e+07 (+1.112e+07)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Mergedinto: 903775
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment