New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 903236 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Chrome
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Abrt in quipper::PerfReader::MaybeSwapEventFields

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Nov 8

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5127939127246848

Fuzzer: libFuzzer_chromeos_quipper_perf_reader_read_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_ubsan_chromeos
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Abrt
Crash Address: 0x000000000001
Crash State:
  quipper::PerfReader::MaybeSwapEventFields
  quipper::PerfReader::ReadPipedData
  quipper::PerfReader::ReadFromData
  
Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_ubsan_chromeos&range=3110653:3111064

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5127939127246848

Issue filed automatically.

See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/docs/+/master/fuzzing.md#Reproducing-crashes-from-ClusterFuzz for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Nov 8

Cc: lakshm...@chomium.org gmx@chromium.org chongjiang@chromium.org
Labels: ClusterFuzz-Auto-CC
Automatically adding ccs based on OWNERS file / target commit history.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label.
Cc: -manojgupta@google.com manojgupta@chromium.org
Cc: cmt...@chromium.org
Cc: lakshm...@chromium.org
Owner: lakshm...@chromium.org
Components: OS>Systems
Project Member

Comment 7 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 1

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5127939127246848 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. The testcase is still reproducible. This happened due to a code refactoring on ClusterFuzz side, and the underlying root cause is now fixed. Resetting the label back to Reproducible. Sorry about the inconvenience caused from these incorrect notifications.
Project Member

Comment 9 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 4

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5127939127246848 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. 
The testcase is still reproducible. 
This was caused by a bug in ClusterFuzz that has been fixed. 
Sorry again for the inconvenience.
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
This issue has an owner, a component and a priority, but is still listed as untriaged or unconfirmed. By definition, this bug is triaged. Changing status to "assigned". Please reach out to me if you disagree with how I've done this.

Sign in to add a comment