Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
92.5% regression in memory.desktop at 601365:601391 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 8
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13cf26e1e40000
,
Nov 8
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13cf26e1e40000
,
Nov 9
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1728e18de40000
,
Nov 9
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1728e18de40000 gpu: Fix raster implementation error for no flush result available query by khushalsagar@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/da82bcce69bf5384435976a1945c9cb3270c5abb memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size: 1.101e+08 → 6.533e+07 (-4.479e+07) viz: Throttle begin-frames when gpu is busy. by sadrul@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/5c2e137dc5294b30492a05a96a33bf0c7ff12908 memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size: 6.581e+07 → 8.216e+07 (+1.635e+07) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: None
,
Nov 9
Recovered in range 603894 - 603928 (possibly because of 603921) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 8