Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.7%-56.2% regression in media.desktop at 605699:605805 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 7
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14fac4b9e40000
,
Nov 7
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14fac4b9e40000 [media] Enable MojoVideoDecoder by default. by sandersd@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/44323658c5cc4fff0a2d4a0bcd1d4aa9a7290c87 memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size: 1.475e+07 → 2.304e+07 (+8.294e+06) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: None
,
Nov 7
Issue 902898 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 7
Issue 902896 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 7
There do seem to be small (100KB-3MB) increases in |effective_size_avg| stats on Mac, but I can't find (statistically significant) UMA evidence that this is a problem in practice. I am not sure how |effective_size_avg| is computed, and there are several kinds of memory involved. The most relevant are: - SHM for transferring encoded data. GpuVideoDecoder uses a pool of SHM segments, MojoVideoDecoder uses a fixed ring buffer. - VideoFrames backed by IOSurfaces. These are system resources that do not get counted unless the memory tracing infrastructure is used. GpuVideoDecoder and MojoVideoDecoder use different paths to release these resources that may have different latency profiles. I'll continue to monitor as this rolls out to
,
Nov 8
,
Nov 8
Issue 903357 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 8
Issue 902893 has been merged into this issue.
,
Dec 17
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 7