Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.8%-91.7% regression in webrtc_perf_tests at 25530:25531 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 7
Hi, these changes (mainly increased cpu usage) appear correlated with cl https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/109009, "Fixing bug in SimulatedNetwork where packets stop." Can you have a look? Is the simulated network used in these tests?
,
Nov 7
Yes, they are using FakeNetworkPipe. I guess the changes in the metrics could be cause by the changes in locking behavior. As quality metrics are unchanged I'll close this.
,
Nov 7
Any details on the changes in locking behavior? To me an increase in cpu load by 5 percentage points sounds like a *lot* of cycles if it's due to lock contention or something like that.
,
Nov 7
No, I don't know. Since it's a simulation effect I figure it shouldn't matter that much. If there's a need for better performance in that code, it's probably to add a feature request for that.
,
Nov 7
Hmm. You add one critsect to NextDeliveryTimeUs. Odd that it should have a large effect on cpu usage, maybe it's called a lot more often than it should? Anyway, if you think the increased cpu usage is in order, I'll leave it for now. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 7