New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 899473 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Chrome
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Direct-leak in dri2_initialize_surfaceless

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Oct 27

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5127325614866432

Fuzzer: libFuzzer_chromeos_virgl_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_asan_chromeos
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Direct-leak
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  dri2_initialize_surfaceless
  dri2_initialize
  _eglMatchDriver
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_asan_chromeos&range=2801419:2801745

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5127325614866432

Issue filed automatically.

See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/docs/+/master/fuzzing.md#Reproducing-crashes-from-ClusterFuzz for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Oct 27

Cc: davidriley@google.com marcheu@google.com zachr@google.com
Labels: ClusterFuzz-Auto-CC
Automatically adding ccs based on OWNERS file / target commit history.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label.
Cc: pwang@chromium.org
Owner: pwang@chromium.org
Components: UI>GFX
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 5 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 1

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5127325614866432 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. The testcase is still reproducible. This happened due to a code refactoring on ClusterFuzz side, and the underlying root cause is now fixed. Resetting the label back to Reproducible. Sorry about the inconvenience caused from these incorrect notifications.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. The testcase is still reproducible. This happened due to a code refactoring on ClusterFuzz side, and the underlying root cause is now fixed. Resetting the label back to Reproducible. Sorry about the inconvenience caused from these incorrect notifications.
Project Member

Comment 8 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 4

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5127325614866432 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. 
The testcase is still reproducible. 
This was caused by another bug in ClusterFuzz that has been fixed. 
Sorry again for the inconvenience.

Sign in to add a comment