Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-2.1% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 600662:600738 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 25
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/117d5d11e40000
,
Oct 25
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/117d5d11e40000
,
Nov 20
alexilin, looks like your change (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/81c4128e3f75163f0a99c021c3bfc8ce5c0d7a0f) deal with memory, could you take a look?
,
Nov 21
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/125b9e3de40000
,
Nov 21
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/125b9e3de40000 [DOMStorage] Enable onion soup codepath by dmurph@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/80ce30280a48850aad465138b84fe209474733e8 memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size: 1.817e+07 → 1.828e+07 (+1.122e+05) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
,
Dec 10
This onion soup change modifies where memory is stored in a couple places. We have both regressions and improvements and they seem to equal out. I'm assuming this is part of those movements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 25