Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.2%-40960% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 600955:601056 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 25
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/171076eee40000
,
Oct 25
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/171076eee40000 gpu: Fix raster implementation error for no flush result available query by khushalsagar@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/da82bcce69bf5384435976a1945c9cb3270c5abb memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size: 4096 → 1.577e+06 (+1.573e+06) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: None
,
Oct 26
All graphs have recovered with the change for rate limiting the query (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1292110) I'm going to guess this was another case of these queries changing the timing of cleanup when combined with the change above for removing the accidental flush that was added with the change which introduced these raster queries. Either way, its fixed now. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 25