Accept header doesn't include MIME type of <object>
Reported by
leose...@rambler.ru,
Oct 20
|
||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.87 Safari/537.36 Example URL: https://jsfiddle.net/5dxw7tbr/1/ Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Go to https://jsfiddle.net/5dxw7tbr/1/ 2. Open Network tab in Devtools 3. Look at request headers What is the expected behavior? A MIME type specified for <object> should be prefered MIME type in Accept header. If typemustmatch="true" specified, it should be the one MIME type in Accept header. What went wrong? All network requests caused by any <object> always have the same Accept header: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8 Did this work before? No Chrome version: 67.0.3396.87 Channel: stable OS Version: 6.1 (Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2) Flash Version: Also related to <embed>
,
Oct 22
,
Nov 9
Thanks for filing the issue! Tried testing the issue on chrome reported version# 67.0.3396.87 using Windows-10 with steps mentioned below: 1) Launched chrome reported version and navigated to URL: https://jsfiddle.net/5dxw7tbr/1/ provided in comment# 0 2) Opened Devtools > Network, reloaded the page, able to see few instances generated in Network tab @Reporter: Please find the attached screenshot for your reference and let us know if we missed anything in reproducing the issue, if possible could you please provide screencast of the issue which help in better understanding. Thanks!
,
Dec 20
See attached screenshot for details.
,
Dec 20
Thank you for providing more feedback. Adding the requester to the cc list. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Dec 21
typemustmatch is not yet implemented in Chromium: https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/renderer/core/html/html_object_element.idl?type=cs&q=htmlobjectelement+typemustmatch&sq=package:chromium&g=0&l=31 foolip: The idl lists TODO(foolip). Are you still interested in this bug?
,
Dec 21
I just added the TODO when comparing spec IDL to Blink's IDL, and a user name is required in TODOs. Marking as available. |
||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||
Comment 1 by phanindra.mandapaka@chromium.org
, Oct 21