Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.2% regression in blink_perf.image_decoder at 600291:600310 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 19
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13c96daee40000
,
Oct 19
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13c96daee40000 Roll AFDO from 72.0.3582.0_rc-r1 to 72.0.3583.0_rc-r1 by chromium-autoroll@skia-public.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/a630a996c84d410a7a27a6a8e80f95da4cc68b36 decode-lossless-webp: 1.22e+04 → 1.261e+04 (+414.8) Document how to deal with a stack trace that has a lot of inlining. by fergal@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/525ee5e59c1a8549a8e99e45ff05dbd9b05a92d4 decode-lossless-webp: 1.259e+04 → 1.274e+04 (+149.8) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
,
Oct 22
Regression came from new AFDO data, adding this to the list in https://crbug.com/889742 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 19