New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 897114 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 897115
Owner:
Closed: Oct 23
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

21.3% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 600103:600170

Project Member Reported by hjd@google.com, Oct 19

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=897114

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=f30ba3d8371a8a712dc4e9f49e66243de36cb3b604666ade3e18eebbbc3bdd5e


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Cc: andrescj@chromium.org
Owner: andrescj@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/102a6a4ee40000

Disallow libjpeg_turbo downscaling of images with non-whole MCUs. by andrescj@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/8b9172a61f4e507b2eef30b2af438d2c19c0992d
memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size: 3.978e+06 → 8.936e+06 (+4.958e+06)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Mergedinto: 897115
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment