Random question: do we know how many of Ghostscript's are really used in CrOS? I see that today, we just build with --drivers=ALL, and if I just restrict that to --drivers=PS I save >5MB in libgs.so.* alone (~12M -> ~5M on Coral). But I don't think that's the extent of the drivers we use, and I don't know about plans to utilize more of those long-term.

For reference:

$ ./configure --help
...
  --with-drivers=LIST     Drivers to support, separated by commas.
                          Either list the drivers or use aliases:
                          ALL      = all drivers
                          FILES    = all file format drivers
                          PRINTERS = all printer drivers
                          Printers:
                          APPLE    = all Apple printers
                          BROTHER  = all Brother printers
                          CANON    = all Canon printers
                          EPSON    = all Epson printers
                          HP       = all HP printers
                          IBM      = all IBM printers
                          JAPAN    = older japanese printers
                          LEXMARK  = all Lexmark printers
                          OKI      = all OKI printers
                          PCLXL    = all PCL XL/6 printers
                          File formats:
                          BMP      = Output to bmp files
                          FAX      = Output to fax files
                          JPEG     = Output to JPEG files
                          PBM      = Output to PBM/PNM
                          PCX      = Output to PCX
                          PNG      = Output to PNG
                          PS       = Output to PostScript/PDF
                          TIFF     = Output to TIFF
                          You can mix both variants, e.g.
                          --with-drivers=HP,stcolor would build HP drivers and
                          the Epson stcolor driver.
                          Aliases must be uppercase (a 3rd party driver might
                          have the same name).
                          Default: ALL

I ask, partly because of bugs like bug 888744. But if this is a significant maintenance burden (e.g., we want to allow any of these through custom PPDs, etc.), perhaps it's not worth poking too hard at (and I'd be satisfied with a WontFix).