Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4%-6.8% regression in memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size at 600027:600187 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 17
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/17420996e40000
,
Oct 17
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/17420996e40000 Reland gpu: Add UMA metric for measuring total raster task duration. by khushalsagar@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/cd8fbb77cfa164eef66378204a588443af9bb875 memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size: 3.923e+07 → 4.156e+07 (+2.334e+06) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
,
Oct 17
The entire increase is in malloc memory reported by the GPU process (9.7 -> 12.5). While the skia cache in the GPU at the time of the dump is empty, the gpu memory is still up by 2M which is completely attributed to mapped memory. In the context cache purging, this is the memory that's cleared. So I think this is another case of change in timing of the purging affecting whether it was processed in the GPU at the time of the memory dump. I've still requested a debug trace for this to verify: https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/130b134ce40000
,
Oct 18
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 17