New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 896261 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Untriaged
Owner: ----
Cc:
sullivan@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6%-3,666.7% regression in mean_frame_time_renderer_compositor,queueing_durations,tasks_per_frame_total_all,thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame,thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame at 600027:600187

Project Member Reported by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 17 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 17 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=896261

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=3c69db501e757efc635f5c8eaeff9079ad80f096a0f58f1b2bb0af1d0875b038


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Android Nexus5X WebView Perf
Android Nexus6 WebView Perf
android-nexus5x-perf
linux-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

system_health.common_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks

rendering.mobile - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/rendering-benchmarks

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks

rendering.desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/rendering-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 17 

📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/101c3d96e40000

Comment 4 by sullivan@chromium.org, Oct 17

Summary: 6%-3,666.7% regression in mean_frame_time_renderer_compositor,queueing_durations,tasks_per_frame_total_all,thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame,thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame at 600027:600187 (was: 6%-3,666.7% regression in console:error:all,cpu_time_percentage,mean_frame_time_renderer_compositor,queueing_durations,tasks_per_frame_total_all,thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame,thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame at 600027:600187)
Some unrelated regressions (which actually should have been ignored) got lumped in here. Trying another bisect on a better graph. Updating subject just to be about rendering benchmarks; ignore system_health benchmarks in #1.
►

Sign in to add a comment