Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
19.8% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 598693:598706 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 15
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/17d677b6e40000
,
Oct 16
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/17d677b6e40000 Roll AFDO from 71.0.3576.0_rc-r1 to 71.0.3577.0_rc-r1 by chromium-autoroll@skia-public.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/6fb1a0860e442c7f9707c2003d219cb03b3dff81 insert-before: 43.28 → 35.09 (-8.196) Rename WebThread to Thread in the entire code base. by yutak@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/625d998496348a053dd112fc5b6c09364633882e insert-before: 34.42 → 35.5 (+1.085) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
,
Oct 16
This seems like a false alert according to the graph. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 15