Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5%-2.6% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 599452:599486 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 15
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1420df22e40000
,
Oct 16
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1420df22e40000
,
Oct 16
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/11ae9dcae40000
,
Oct 19
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/11ae9dcae40000 [heap] Externalize mark bitmap. by hpayer@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/17890f67fbd1cafa33f472559f09a1fad70993ce memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size: 3.612e+07 → 3.655e+07 (+4.216e+05) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
,
Oct 23
This CL shifts memory around: from V8 heap to malloc. Should be the same in overall. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 15