Stack-overflow in blink::ElementInnerTextCollector::ProcessNode |
|||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6035487553486848 Fuzzer: inferno_twister Job Type: linux_asan_chrome_media Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Stack-overflow Crash Address: 0x7ffd6dc28400 Crash State: blink::ElementInnerTextCollector::ProcessNode blink::ElementInnerTextCollector::ProcessChildren Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_chrome_media&range=585755:585756 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6035487553486848 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Oct 3
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/72d438ee5563db3087ea1f6630834343bdb8fb65 (Implement Element#innerText to conform the spec). If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label. If you aren't the correct owner for this issue, please unassign yourself as soon as possible so it can be re-triaged.
,
Oct 4
Mark WontFix because the test script attempt to call Element#innerText for 1000 nested DIV elements which is unusual.
,
Oct 10
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 597878:597879. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6035487553486848 Fuzzer: inferno_twister Job Type: linux_asan_chrome_media Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Stack-overflow Crash Address: 0x7ffd6dc28400 Crash State: blink::ElementInnerTextCollector::ProcessNode blink::ElementInnerTextCollector::ProcessChildren Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_chrome_media&range=585755:585756 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_chrome_media&range=597878:597879 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6035487553486848 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page. |
|||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Oct 3Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components