New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 890510 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Chrome
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

[wifi_atten_perf] [Daisy]Low TCP TX throughput results for ch 6,153

Project Member Reported by jmuppala@chromium.org, Sep 28

Issue description

Chrome OS Version: <From about:version: Platform R69-10895.67.0>
Chrome OS Platform: <Daisy snow>

On M69, We see low TCP TX throughput on Daisy for channel 44 and 153 compared to builds from M68.

Logs links below:
http://cautotest.corp.google.com/afe/#tab_id=view_job&object_id=241290375

Rerun:
https://storage.cloud.google.com/chromiumos-test-logs/M68_Reports/R69-Daisy-Wifi-Atten-Perf.tar.gz?_ga=2.163649400.-679425074.1535672014


 
Labels: M-70
Summary: [wifi_atten_perf] [Daisy]Low TCP TX throughput results for ch 6,44,153 (was: [wifi_atten_perf] [Daisy]Low TCP TX throughput results for ch 44,153)
seeing low throughput for channel 6, 153 on R70 for Daisy.
Owner: jmuppala@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Just looked at TCP tx data for Ch 44 from the logs you provided and I see better throughput on M69 compared to M68.

Jeevitha, can you copy/paste the throughput data in the bug where you see the regression?

M68
daisy ch044			
Attenuation	Throughput(Mbps)	StdDev(Mbps)	Client Reported Signal
59	87.134	9.36472601486	-48
63	79.8633333333	0.46306946923	-52
67	88.181	13.9857176751	-56
71	95.7866666667	0.298384539367	-59
75	100.326666667	0.262741951986	-63
79	99.8033333333	0.374343870436	-67
83	99.4933333333	0.522908532473	-72
87	65.638	3.77189548577	-76
91	58.9366666667	0.706847461149	-79
95	58.4433333333	1.28554787283	-82
99	56.128	1.81438572403	-85



M69
daisy ch044
Attenuation	Throughput(Mbps)	StdDev(Mbps)	Client Reported Signal
59	95.82	0.572974694031	-47
63	95.6066666667	0.290229794014	-52
67	83.896	9.70610254771	-55
71	100.333333333	0.2136195996	-60
75	100.376666667	0.212210587232	-64
79	95.93	0.357910603363	-68
83	95.89	0.220680764907	-72
87	95.29	0.35	-76
91	95.3466666667	0.9473295801	-80
95	76.3166666667	1.59374820261	-83
99	74.1733333333	0.410040648392	-85
Summary: [wifi_atten_perf] [Daisy]Low TCP TX throughput results for ch 6,153 (was: [wifi_atten_perf] [Daisy]Low TCP TX throughput results for ch 6,44,153)
Hi Harpreet, sorry my bad, i have updated the reports with the correct numbers and i see low throughput for TCP tx on atten087 for channel 6, 153 and not channel 44.

For ch6 most runs on M69 and M70 show throughput below 40mbps. 

https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=bfd1a21dd27393325308a1f018dc00f0f00f26b30c6a9c849890dade1eef8fb8&start_rev=34970191089500700&end_rev=35110001095600000


For ch153, looking at historical throughput data it seems to be inline. The chart below shows data for few different atten values (79 - 91)...

https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=e593a0d7e875a860f39b9c83fce6cfae40336c99bcd1d7d90096df4ec0ea6264&start_rev=32390501003203900&end_rev=35380131102101000



The M68 throughput being higher may be due to the grover setup (old vs. new). Aashutosh, do you have the test logs for the M68 atten perf run that you kicked off to collect that data?

Sign in to add a comment