New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 889051 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner:
Closed: Sep 25
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.3%-2.3% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 592419:592658

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, Sep 25

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=889051

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=2e06a63367e1e0b751093b2071fbce22248c79fbded75b89649827b5b1c32481


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Win 7 Nvidia GPU Perf
Win 7 Perf

system_health.memory_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Cc: cblume@chromium.org
Owner: cblume@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/15b5a4b7640000

Reland SkGifCodec by cblume@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/0ffa5c7b260f5ac3290bad107d5b74faba967ceb
7.602e+07 → 7.787e+07 (+1.854e+06)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Mergedinto: 887372
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment