New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 888163 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

15.4% regression in media.desktop at 592982:593029

Project Member Reported by chcunningham@chromium.org, Sep 21

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=888163

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=668ae0ff284dbea664394e8ca5c0dc8f8fdd2b3b5904002a01c2b62bc91d19c1


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

media.desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  None
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/171c6f97640000
^^ trying again with wider range. The graphs show a slow bump, so it may be hard to detect. Ref graph steady-ish. Somewhat noisy.
Cc: steimel@chromium.org
Owner: steimel@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/15b431b7640000

[Media Controls] Move doubletap handling to MediaControlsImpl by steimel@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/2dfe550c2ef6712eecc39e0702246d27648bb646
1.12e+08 → 1.196e+08 (+7.542e+06)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  None

Sign in to add a comment