New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 887480 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Duplicate
Owner:
jarin@chromium.org
Closed: Oct 5
Cc:
jarin@chromium.org
█ alexclarke@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

31.2%-38.8% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 592380:592410

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Sep 20 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 20 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=887480

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=d155430d9bb7482bb91ecc1db8412fcf442457fcbefd84ef7f550b94ed510be5


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

blink_perf.canvas - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 21

Cc: jarin@chromium.org
Owner: jarin@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14fa6284e40000

Turn on full masking with untrusted-code-mitigations by jarin@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/6a6f050e18b90d5b498d85455e598ca68b14238f
889.3 → 609 (-280.4)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks

Comment 4 by jarin@chromium.org, Oct 5

Mergedinto: 887213
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
►

Sign in to add a comment